Tuesday, 9 April 2013

Danielle Fitzsimmons, Project One, Week Two

 
this is my exploded geometric contour drawing. what I have found with this is that it is rather balanced and asymmetrical. as a specification to my primitive shape, I need to be able to show evenly the whole space of the drawing in order to not miss so much detail of the contour.
 
 
These are my experimental primitives, what I found with my experiments is that I want to depict as many different ways of documenting space as I could. what I found that best solved my aim was to have many faces on the chosen shape, also having a dynamic way of presenting the different shape views through the asotate.
 
 
This is my chosen primitive. I found that it relates well to the specifications that I set for myself in finding a primitive that is able to present the window of different spaces dynamically and multiple at once, as well as documenting that space in many different perspectives. 
 
 
This is part of the draft net of my chosen primitive. the spaces of the net are not joined so I could express the range of the contour drawing extensively. I tested it out on paper with the contours on it to see if the effect was successful. I found that with the range of contours, it gave the asotate model much more distinction and range of hardline to softline contours.

 
This is my final asotate model. what I have learned this week was the range of space you can create with different shapes. also the ways you can control what space you want to create using the contours and primitive shapes. What I found interesting with the asotate model, was giving depth by projecting through one face and connecting to not just one or two faces on the other side, but being able to connect to three contour faces through the asotate.


No comments:

Post a Comment